We Are The World, or SOML, boasts 150 million users worldwide. Is a) a valuable lesson or b) wasted time?
What Is System Devlopment Life Cycle Online Learning
What is System Devlopment Life Cycle Online Learning?
Soon after San Francisco-based Microsoft launched its online learning program, “Saints and Sinners: Surviving the Midnight Hour,” in 2005, one reviewer wrote: “I thought it was an interesting tool. It seemed new at the time, though I later learned that the company had been testing the site for four months in 2005 before allowing students to use it.” The program was a combination of assessments and small assignments given through out the semester that served as testable progress metrics. Users took the assessments as required; the assignments were graded and thus transformed into suggested work. Users rated progress and provided feedback, or “checks,” of what to do in the coming week. Those outcomes, along with whatever feedback users provided, were used as the “average classroom grade” for their class. From this observation came the “average course course average student” for the analysis.
Study: Online certification high school equivalency courses from Chicago-based ExamPath—ranked number 2 in the country in 2018 by the Association of College Testing Services—meet the same standards as their brick-and-mortar competitors. (The IT curriculum includes computer skills, medical terminology, career assessments, economics, English, foreign language, and more.)
In fact, Bridge Academy’s mini-scores (not average grades) are more comparable to those on the ground—peer grade ratings of students about teachers—than it is to online testing, which focuses on individual self-perceptions of quality in a subject area. This echoes an ongoing controversy over technology’s role in education and accountability in particular.
What is the attractiveness of Online vs. Offline Learning?
Online coursework or feedback, according to an analysis of what students need, is attractive to students because they get a “higher-quality experience” than they otherwise would have, according to an unnamed grad student with a Ph.D. from the University of Colorado–Boulder (search “online learning research”) and personal experience in both online and offline learning. (Original article here.) “I think a lot of online learning techniques shift the emphasis from hands-on, collaborative learning to student assessment,” he says.”
A Stanford study (also referenced in the graduate doctoral thesis) found that online studies improved learning and academic achievement with those students better able to practice topics they had just learned with their peers. Online scholars at Columbia University and the University of Indiana have likewise determined that peer-to-peer interaction and discussion, not alone, is the most effective pedagogical format, and that online programs don’t need more grade-point averages than their offline peers.
Better online learning training from such research yields a pro-online mentality from institutions. The quality of online education is an issue only worth discussing, they say, when state-of-the-art technology is being used to deliver learning. That’s when—and, it appears, when—the quality and effectiveness of online learning can be readily compared and judged.
There are many other valid reasons why students benefit from the experience of learning offline or online. Training programs like Microsoft and ExamPath are quick to recognize what’s required. But so are others. Stanford, if the excellent study is to be believed, demonstrates that great teaching is still a very real and vital tool when delivered in ways that are efficient. Whether your learning about value and accuracy in learning or getting a seat at the new Terra Hip Hotel, the fact is that the best learning that we can offer comes from good teachers with great tools. Online learning is another fine tool in the teacher’s arsenal, but here’s a caution to keep in mind. School doesn’t have to be different. Learning about what we’re good at when we’re young and bad is the real fuel for creativity and learning. Gearing students up for learning doesn’t lessen the importance of finding the best practice for learning for each, but it does demonstrate the power of recognizing good practices at all stages of an educational career.